![]() ![]() Both are now in the ", RAS I double-checked the groups I had added to the CAP and verified the account I was using should be authorized. We are using Azure MFA on another server to authenticate. I followed the official documentation from Microsoft, configuring two servers as a farm, and creating a single CAP and RAP identically on each server. A Microsoft app that connects remotely to computers and to virtual apps and desktops. and our All the users are having issues to login to the RDS, below are the error on the RD Gateway, I have the logs of the NPS extension server. The authentication method used was: "NTLM" and connection protocol used: "HTTP". Reason:The specified domain does not exist. When I chose"Authenticate request on this server". In the results pane, in the list of TS CAPs, right-click the TS CAP that you want to check, and then click. Not applicable (no computer group is specified) The authentication method used was: "NTLM" and connection protocol used: "HTTP". We are seeing this generic error on Windows when trying to connect: Remote Desktop can't connect to the remote computerfor one of these reasons: Your user account is not authorized to access the RD Gateway, Your computer is not authorized to access the RG Gateway, You are using an incompatible authentication method. Computer: I have had this message pop up for one of my old clients I still do support for and I am still the Admin for on their 365 system. The user "domain\testuser", on client computer "10.1.1.40", did not meet connection authorization policy requirements and was therefore not authorized to access the TS Gateway server. ![]() While it has been rewarding, I want to move into something more advanced. I continue investigating and found the Failed Audit log in the security event log: Authentication Details: All Rights Reserved. Hope that helps to get you pointed in the right direction on this.It is generated on the computer that was accessed. Instead you might want to look into using a Code by Zapier action to handle transaction references that come in a variety of formats, but that’s a bit more advanced so might not be an ideal solution here. If the transaction name is in a different format every time though this approach wouldn’t work. If the transaction was RECURRING PYMNT 2JAN2023GOOGLE/BILL CA 123.12X1.123456712 it would extract the word GOOGLE. So if the transaction was RECURRING PYMNT 12MAY2023apple/BILL CA 123.12X1.123456789 it would extract the word apple. You can find out more about how to use Regex patterns here: Find text with regular expressions in Zaps ![]() The \d part would first find a match for the date and the ( ) part finds the group of letters (regardless of case) after the date, that should contain the vendor company name. If they always follow the exact same format then you could potentially extract the vendor company name using a Formatter (Text > Extract Pattern) action with the following Regex pattern: Hey the transactions all follow the exact same format? Or would they be different depending on the supplier? So I’m creating a Zap to format the transaction name, and remove numbers, and create a method that its more searchable. it'll only find the entire line, cause it's taken from a bank statement, and you know how weird those are.įor instance if the Transaction name would be "RECURRING PYMNT 6MAR2023AIRTABLE.COM/BILL CA 716.76X1.397259891" I want to search and find Airtable, but. and I am starting an automation that triggers when it's entered this view, then I wanted to search the vendors list for the text that is in the Name field. I made a view that has all the empty vendors fields. I'm trying to find a way to search the Vendors so that it'll populate the LookUp field or linked Field automatically. ![]() the Name field in the Transactions table sometimes contains the same text as in the Vendor field (which is called ' Who' ), but not always, so I want to search for the text in the Transations: Name to find a the name of the vendor in the Vendors:Who field. I have an airtable Table Vendor, and Table Transactions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |